Cowboys & Aliens Review

“That’s fucking retarded.”

That was my very first, non-politically correct impression when I saw the movie announcement teaser for Cowboys & Aliens, and believe me when I say that my impression hasn’t changed even after watching the film in the theater.

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a movie in a theater. I’m not even joking when I say that the only movie that compelled me to traverse the sticky theater floors of spilled soda and wads of chewed gum, buy a $10 tub of two-day old popcorn and a 8” box of Jujubes that had enough candy to fill a condom wrapper, and tolerate the never ending film commentary and cell phone calls from the crowds of tweenage twats and college frat fuckheads was to go see The Dark Knight.

As you can tell, I HATE HATE HATE going to movie theaters because it’s an extremely expensive and relatively unpleasant experience that requires something special for me to even contemplate putting myself through. But I had to bear through all the shit to go watch Cowboys & Aliens because, honestly, Cowboys & Aliens had a premise that potentially made it the perfect movie to actually listen to the would-be Mystery Science Theater 3000 style commentaries from the audience.

I couldn't have been more wrong...

So... Cowboys.... and Aliens... Hrmm...

Cowboys & Aliens is an adaption of Scott Mitchell Rosenberg's graphic novel of the same name, involving cowboys and Indians having shootouts with aliens and spaceships. Having not read the graphic novel, and likely never reading it after watching the movie, I don't particularly see the draw to Cowboys & Aliens that attracted director Jon Favreau, a total of 11 big-named Hollywood producers such as Steven Spielberg, Ron Howard, and Brian Grazer, and half-a-dozen writers.

What I keep telling myself is that this LEGION of Hollywood talent wasn't assembled because the concept of cowboys and aliens shooting each other was necessarily a good one, but that it was the only way for people to take a film titled "Cowboys & Aliens" seriously.

The story begins with 007 Daniel Craig playing the amnesiac, stone-faced, lone wolf cowboy Jake Lonergan (Loner-gun?) who wanders into little 1875 American Wild West town, Absolution, New Mexico, wearing a mysterious metal bracelet. Jake takes a lot of abuse defending the stereotypically oppressed townsfolk from greedy thugs, damn near systematically going from one confrontation to another until he winds up crossing the asshole uber-privileged son of rich cattle baron Woodrow Dolarhyde (Harrison Ford), and the local lawmen who recognize Jake Lonergan as being a dangerous criminal. So Jake gets taken in by the law and right before he gets his ass tossed over to the US Marshals, shit hits the fan when a space ship appears and begins abducting people right off of the street.

…

When a SPACE SHIP appears and begins abducting people right off of the street.

…

Now, I’m no Fox Mulder when it comes to UFOs and alien abductions, but aren’t UFOs and aliens normally more discreet? It’s at this point that my suspicions of Cowboys & Aliens being an entirely ‘meh, fuck it’ grind house styled film, like the so-bad-it's-good cowboy vampire direct-to-DVD flop Bloodrayne 2, are made manifest, and the possibility that behind this goofy concept the talented production crew would make it a somewhat intelligent film dissipated in my overly audible “The fuck?!”


The common reaction to the first space ship scene

So under a hail of futile gunfire and screams from townsfolk thinking that the aliens are ‘demons’, Jake’s magic bracelet comes to life, and from that point on he learns how to use the bracelet as a weapon against the looming alien threat. Harrison Ford’s two-dimensional evil cattle baron character, Dolarhyde, rounds up a posse, including Jake simply for the sake of the alien technology strapped to Jake's wrist, and they set off to go fight the extraterrestrials who stole their friends and family for unknown purposes that border on experimentation and anal probing. A third character, Ella (Olivia Wilde) joins the posse with the guise that she knows more about the alien invaders than she lets on. Exactly what Ella’s connection to the aliens is, I won’t spoil because you should enjoy the whole 12 seconds spent formulating your own speculations.

During their travels, the learn that the aliens are equal opportunity abductors, as many Native American people are also being snatched from their teepees. At this point I actually got excited from the prospect of cowboys and Indians (er, Native Americans) putting their differences aside and battling a common enemy in a gripping and flamboyant series of battles, but director Jon Favreau (director of the visual feast, Iron Man) doesn’t give Cowboys & Aliens the edge it desperately needed.

In fact, for a bizarre genre-bending thriller, Cowboys & Aliens plays itself way too safe. For instance, all of the characters (Ford’s Dolarhyde, Craig’s Jake, etc) are stock, cardboard cutout American Western characters that feel as though they were lifted from old John Wayne movies, rather than complex characters like Russell Crowe and Christian Bale’s characters in the superior 3:10 to Yuma. Francis Dolarhyde… er, Woodrow Dolarhyde (Harrison Ford) is a stock monopolistic cattle baron who rules his corner of the West like a mobster, however Ford does bring a lot of charisma and downright ruthlessness to Dolarhyde, unlike Daniel Craig’s Jake Lonergan, the bland, stoic lone gun who comes off as a slightly B-movie Clint Eastwood from the Sergio Leone era. I had hoped to see British actor Daniel Craig at least struggle with a western drawling accent like an old woman trying to open a jar of pickles, but I didn't even get that.

A lot of scenes were downright unnecessary. For instance, it's awesome that cowboys and Native Americans are joining forces, but instead of nodding heads, and riding off to fight aliens on horseback, they pad out the scene just to help stretch a 70 minute concept into a 120 minute movie.

The most disappointing thing about Cowboys & Aliens is that it isn’t even close to stupid action-and-special-effects porn (Independence Day is obviously the first movie that comes to mind). The visual effects are 'okay' rather than pushing boundaries or going over the top, and most of the time you’re looking at the beautiful backgrounds than the action in the foreground. Sure, there's a handful of decent scenes (none of which I will ruin for you, if you actually care) but the whole film was just overwhelmingly "meh".

Cowboys & Aliens is just bland. The special effects aren't mind-blowing, and the characters are cut-and-paste from almost every western film ever made.

Lone, stone faced gunslinger? Check.
Evil cattle baron? Check.
Goofy saloon owner? Check.
Mysterious person who knows about the alien menace? Check.

But under the surface of Cowboys & Aliens there's an underlying theme of 'manifest destiny' which turns the colonization of the United States on its head, in an interesting way. The European settlers managed to successfully colonize the Americas and nearly drive the natives to extinction due to their technological advances, but mostly in the field of weaponry. What Cowboys & Aliens does is take 'manifest destiny' to the next level, where extraterrestrials come swooping out of the skies, possessing technology beyond that of the 19th century, and beyond the understanding of 19th century people, who can't understand anything the technology and refer to them as 'demons'. So, naturally, warring settlers and the natives have to settle their differences and fight a common enemy.

Overall, I'd say that I went into Cowboys & Aliens looking for cheap LULZ and came out disappointed that the film wasn't incredibly good, or incredibly bad, just mediocre. Harrison Ford outshines Daniel Craig, despite being the #2 leading man in this film, but neither of them give off a performance worthy of their past accomplishments. The special effects are also just unimpressive. They're not bad by any sense of the word, but given that the director of Cowboys & Aliens also directed Iron Man (and its relatively mediocre sequel) I expected more 'pizazz'. It's like Favreau used all of his talent in Iron Man 1 and it's been a downhill slide ever since then. The concept is ridiculous but it didn't even attempt to make itself a big budget mockbuster like Machete or Grindhouse, which not only hurt my expectations, but made an outlandish concept not that outlandish in the least.

If you want LULZ, you'll need to look somewhere else.
If you want a good sci-fi, you'll need to look somewhere else.
If you want a good western, you'll need to look somewhere else.
If you want a good action film, you're in the ballpark but you'll still probably want to look somewhere else.

Cowboys & Aliens is just... underwhelming, especially considering that they had a premise that could have been intelligent, or hysterically self-mockingly bad.

First of all, while I realize that this is going to sound as mystifying and deviant as two fat, basement-dwelling nerds meeting at an Anime Convention and discovering that both of them like to sniff their little sisters' panties, but still: You hate actually going to the cinema, too? Sweet Jesus, finally!

Dude, you can't even imagine how irritating it gets when everyone and their dog keeps nagging you, "Oh, but don't you like films, CineMax? You do? Ok, but then why don't you go out to see the latest flicks more often? What, 'cos people are irritating, uncultured swines who can't shut up for at least five seconds and actually let others enjoy the film too without getting their phones out to tweet about how (s)he's in the cinema, munch like an old, rusty locomotive, or, worse yet, explain the back-story or important plot-threads to their retarded ADHD friends who can't concentrate on the screen for longer than one minute if shit doesn't get blown up? Well, you know, it's not like you don't do that too— You don't? Well, excuuuuuuuuuse me, your highness, for being imperfect!" *Runs away in tears*

Anyway, about the review. I enjoyed it, I really did. Sure, it wasn't as detailed or funny as, say, your 'Castlevania' or 'Devil May Cry' reviews, but as a quick, 'on-the-spot' review of a recent flick you saw the previous night (i.e., see your 'There Will Be Blood' or my 'Pirates 4' reviews) it suffices. Personally, I'd add a couple of more images and highlight some of the more, hm, rowdy parts of your review with bold text (you know, like you always do), and off you go!

As for the film itself, meh. I was sort of thinking of checking it out 'cos of the impressive heritage you mentioned, but — as much as I hate when people say, "Thanks to you I'm not even gonna bother watching, and will just take whatever you say as gospel — after reading your review, I might as well not bother. Sound like another insipid, mediocre Summer action flick that will no doubt be forgotten in less than a month...

P.S. Grammar Nazi time!



...and that's about it. Huh...

P.P.S.
*Grins like a Cheshire Cat*

I'm just joking, this is another hilarious review, if a little on the short side . But brevity is fine if it's a quick rundown on an awful movie, and we've already been over what I like and dislike on MSN. That, and I never comment on a lot of other people's articles awaiting approval because CineMax always says what I'm gunna say . That, and he plays Grammar Nazi quite well, so you don't need two Grammar Nazis scrutinizing your work .

I never had any interest in seeing this film from the beginning. Hell i made a joke when its trailer came out

"Damm! Ben 10 got old."

@Cinemax: Yeah, I do short movie reviews because you just 'watch' a movie, rather than experience it. You can't nitpick the graphics or the music as you can a game and the best you can really do is just critique the story and the acting, unfortunately. Or atleast that's what little movie reviewing experience I have. LOL.

So with the correction and pictures, this is ready to go live?

Well what do you know, a written review! About time too.

This new review is really short for a LM review but I don't mind it a lot since I came out and said to quit spending a month on reviews bigger than most books and get to the blood and guts to make more frequent reviews. I agree 110 percent about the shitty service at most of my local theaters except one down town that never gets new movies. All of the others feel like porn theaters with used tissues and seats made sticky by things you're better off not knowing what they are. Cowboys and Aliens must have been one mind numbing movie because there wasn't anything to praise and not enough to crack jokes about but you saved me ticket money so I'll go rent something tonight worth watching at home.

But why didn't you go to see Captain America or something that people are saying is actually good? If you are going to put yourself through the theater experience then why would you intentionally come back empty handed?

Click here for more episodes of GameJams!
Join your host, Kenny Farino, explore the world of video games music remixes and earn a new appreciation for video game music, video game music remixes, and of video game music remixers!

Like I (thought I) said in my review, I went for the LULZ. I honestly expected it to be so horrible that the entire theater would have been a MST3K madhouse, but in a GOOD way. This had the potential to have taken itself too seriously and could have been the biggest joke of the year in the eyes of theater-goers, but it was just 'meh' all around. It wasn't horrible enough to make fun of, and it wasn't good enough to like.

Indeed it was a short review, however isn't it the perfect size for a review for a new movie? Rather than do a point by point breakdown of the entire plot LM has instead touched upon the issues he felt were detrimental so, I am assuming, a person who has not yet seen the new movie is well enough informed prior to purchasing his or her ticket, and yet there is nothing spoiled. Or, perhaps a detailed analysis would require multiple viewings to make a lengthy review, since the games that LM has reviewed are generally eight hours long or longer, and thus he's spent more than one to two hours to formulate a detailed opinion? I'd like to think that it's perhaps a little of both.

That makes perfect sense, because a Nostalgia Critic review with a detailing of the entire plot would be kind of screwing the reader out of the chance to go watch it himself, and that's a huge bitch move with new movies.

Um.... Yup, that's exactly what I intended... Has nothing to do with my short attention span during a mediocre movie