Jumper Review

No problem, I was a bit bored last night, and your Jumper review worked well for my guinea pig editor experiment. LOL.

No problem, anyone who contributes reviews etc get on the AFFILIATES area if they have a site. I did remove The Horror Corner only because Ken mentioned to me that it's a dead project, and since GameJams is an official part of CCS, I figured I'd replace it.

I can give you access to the editor and you can change it yourself

Just PM me a password that you want to use and I'll set you up.

Hehe... he? Anyway, I'm glad it all worked out!

Oh, I see.

Ok. Done

@CineMax and LM:
Thank you for the support

I do wish to make a new review, so will I need to use this new editor? I am happy to test it if you wish.

You're one of our best contributors, ONOE, so I'll gladly let you in.
Send me a PM with a password you want to use for the editor and I'll enable you.

I sent you a password. This new editor sounds exciting!

CineMax wrote one of the funniest reviews for this web site that wasn't drowned by profane language. I may search out this movie just so I can watch it and follow his review. Writing a review of a bad movie that makes me yearn to watch to see is a great feat!

And eventually I will need to cease lurking in the forums and actually write something again.

Click here for more episodes of Mockbuster Mockery!
The series is dedicated to analyzing and eviscerating tasteless low-budged B-grade knock-offs of more popular and expensive Hollywood flicks - Mockbusters. CineMax is an amateur, yet aspiring movie critic, who makes comedic video reviews, writes insightful and analytical articles, and, occasionally just blabbers about stuff he deems important.

Thanks, Dave
On reflection, while I'm flattered that the majority of you found the review to be quite entertaining and funny, but I am seriously considering changing the writing style for the future review. Like LaughingMan said, the TGWTG formula is quite easy and comfortable to use, but after reading the review one more time I realized that a lot of stuff I originally wanted to delivered in my review, while WAS written there in one way or another, but not in the way I originally wanted it. I've still got to decide on what categories to segregate my review, but rest assured that the future projects are going to be more analytical and constructive. Doesn't mean there's not going to be any humour or my traditional snarky review style

So what kind of format did you want to write the Jumper review in? Do you mean like broken down more, or more details, or what? Not like I am concerned or anything, just curious.

...Good question Honestly, I just can't put my finger on it right now. It's just another one of those cases when I'm proud and really engrossed in some project, but after it's released and some time has passed, I immediately grow colder to it and even dismiss it as sub-par, only to promise myself that next time I'll do better and start working on the next project even harder. (Sadly, while proven to be quite useful as an incentive, this bizarre habit of mines really starts getting on my nerves ). If anything, it's probably the TGWTG formula that's repulsing me right now. I mean, while the formula works just fine in MM 'cos of the subject material I'm dealing with there (I honestly doubt someone can talk about Asylum movies without making fun out of all of their stupidity), but I just want my written reviews to be more analytical and constructive (while still entertaining, mind) rather than just mindless shits and giggles. I know I'm probably making a big fuss out of it, but that's just how my sick mind works